Estimate initial transverse stability, metacentric height, righting arm and righting moment. Use known hydrostatic values when available, or use a simplified rectangular / wall-sided approximation for student examples.
Mode: —
Scenario: —
—
Timestamp: —
Transverse stability is one of the most important subjects in naval architecture, ship design, marine engineering, and vessel operation. It describes how a ship behaves when it is heeled to port or starboard by an external force such as wind, waves, cargo shift, turning, passenger movement, lifting operations, or uneven loading. A vessel with adequate transverse stability develops a righting action that tends to bring it back toward the upright position. A vessel with poor transverse stability may become tender, uncomfortable, unsafe, or in extreme cases unstable.
This transverse stability calculator is designed to help students, seafarers, marine engineers, naval architects, surveyors, and vessel operators understand the relationship between KB, KG, KM, GM, GZ, heel angle, and righting moment. The tool can be used as a practical GM calculator, metacentric height calculator, GZ calculator, and simplified righting moment calculator for educational and preliminary stability checks.
The calculator focuses on clear inputs, formula-based output, warnings, and a structured report. It helps explain how the centre of gravity, centre of buoyancy, metacentre, corrected GM, righting arm, and righting moment are related without replacing approved vessel-specific stability data.
Transverse stability is the ability of a ship to resist heeling and return toward the upright position after being inclined sideways. The word "transverse" refers to the athwartship direction, meaning from port to starboard. When a vessel heels, its underwater volume changes shape. Because of this change in immersed volume, the centre of buoyancy moves sideways from its original position.
The ship's weight acts vertically downward through the centre of gravity G. The buoyancy force acts vertically upward through the centre of buoyancy B. When the vessel is upright, these two forces are normally on the same vertical line. When the vessel heels, the centre of buoyancy shifts to a new position, often written as B1. If the upward buoyancy force and downward weight force create a couple that pushes the vessel back upright, the vessel has a righting moment. If the couple acts in the opposite direction, the vessel has a capsizing moment.
In simple terms, transverse stability answers this question: when the vessel heels, does it want to come back upright or continue heeling further?
Basic transverse stability calculations use several reference points. These points are commonly shown in naval architecture diagrams, stability booklets, classroom examples, and loading condition studies.
These points are linked through the main initial stability formula:
GM = KM − KG
Where GM is the transverse metacentric height, KM is the height of the transverse metacentre above keel, and KG is the height of the centre of gravity above keel.
GM, or metacentric height, is one of the most common indicators of initial transverse stability. It is the vertical distance between the centre of gravity G and the transverse metacentre M. For small heel angles, GM gives a quick indication of whether the vessel is initially stable, tender, stiff, or unstable.
If M is above G, the vessel has positive GM. This usually means the vessel has positive initial stability. When the vessel heels slightly, the buoyancy and weight forces create a righting moment that tends to return the ship toward upright.
If M is at the same height as G, the vessel has approximately zero GM. This is a neutral condition where the vessel has little or no initial tendency to return upright.
If M is below G, the vessel has negative GM. This is an unstable condition for initial stability. In this case, a small heel may create a capsizing moment instead of a righting moment.
A larger GM is not always better. A vessel with very large GM may be described as stiff. Stiff vessels tend to return upright quickly and may have a short, uncomfortable rolling period. A vessel with low but positive GM may be described as tender. Tender vessels roll more slowly but may have insufficient stability margin if loading conditions are poor.
The height of the transverse metacentre above keel is calculated as:
KM = KB + BM
KB is the height of the centre of buoyancy above keel. BM is the transverse metacentric radius. In real ship hydrostatics, BM depends on the waterplane moment of inertia and the underwater volume of the vessel:
BM = I / ∇
Where I is the transverse moment of inertia of the waterplane area and ∇ is the vessel's displacement volume. This means that real BM is strongly affected by hull form, waterplane shape, beam, draft, loading condition, and trim.
For this reason, a real vessel's GM should normally be taken from approved hydrostatic data, a stability booklet, or a loading computer. Beam, depth and draft alone are not enough to calculate an accurate GM for a real ship.
For student examples and simplified barge-like calculations, this calculator can use an approximate rectangular or wall-sided model. In this simplified mode, BM is estimated as:
BM ≈ B2 / (12T)
Where B is beam and T is draft. This formula is useful for basic learning because it shows why beam has such a strong effect on transverse stability. Since beam is squared in the formula, increasing beam can significantly increase BM and therefore KM.
However, this rectangular approximation should not be confused with an accurate ship stability calculation. Real hulls are not perfect rectangles. Cargo vessels, tankers, bulk carriers, container ships, Ro-Ro vessels, offshore vessels and passenger ships all have different hull forms, waterplane shapes, internal arrangements and loading characteristics. The approximate method is useful for understanding the concept, but approved hydrostatic data should be used for actual vessel stability assessment.
GZ is the righting arm. It is the perpendicular distance between the line of action of the vessel's weight and the line of action of buoyancy at a given heel angle. In a heeled condition, the centre of buoyancy shifts from B to a new position, often shown as B1. The buoyancy force acts vertically upward through B1, while the vessel's weight acts vertically downward through G.
The distance between these two vertical force lines is the righting arm GZ. If GZ is positive, the resulting moment tends to return the vessel upright. If GZ is negative, the resulting moment tends to heel the vessel further.
For small angles of heel, GZ can be approximated using:
GZ ≈ GM × sin(θ)
In this calculator, the corrected GM is used when free surface correction is entered:
GZ ≈ GMcorrected × sin(θ)
This formula is very useful for initial stability examples, but it should not be used as a full replacement for a real GZ curve. At larger heel angles, the actual righting arm depends on the hull form, deck-edge immersion, downflooding points, superstructure buoyancy, free surface effects, and the vessel's complete hydrostatic characteristics.
In many transverse stability diagrams, the point Z is shown to mark the end of the righting arm. Z is not a fixed physical point on the vessel like K, B, G or M. It is a constructed geometric point used to show the perpendicular distance from G to the buoyancy line of action.
The line segment GZ represents the righting arm. This is why the righting arm is called GZ even though Z is only a geometric construction. In stability diagrams, Z helps show how the weight line and buoyancy line create a moment when the vessel is heeled.
The righting moment is the moment that attempts to return the vessel to the upright position. It depends on displacement and righting arm:
Righting Moment ≈ Δ × GZ
When displacement is entered in tonnes and GZ is entered in metres, the result is commonly shown in tonne-metres:
Righting Moment (tonne-metres) = Displacement (t) × GZ (m)
The calculator can also show the righting moment in kilonewton-metres:
Righting Moment (kNm) = Displacement (t) × 9.80665 × GZ (m)
This is useful when comparing the vessel's calculated righting moment with an entered external heeling moment. For example, a heeling moment may come from a crane operation, cargo shift, wind pressure, towing force, or another simplified loading case. The calculator does not calculate wind, wave or crane forces automatically. It only compares the entered heeling moment with the calculated righting moment.
Free surface effect is one of the most important practical stability issues on ships. When a tank is partly filled, the liquid inside can move as the vessel heels. This movement shifts the liquid's centre of gravity and reduces the vessel's effective stability.
Ballast tanks, fuel oil tanks, fresh water tanks, bilge wells, slop tanks, cargo tanks and other partially filled spaces may create free surface effect. The result is usually treated as a reduction in GM:
GMcorrected = GM − Free Surface Correction
This calculator allows a free surface correction value to be entered manually. If no free surface correction is entered, the calculator assumes it is zero. For real loading conditions, free surface corrections should be taken from the approved stability booklet or loading computer.
The calculator provides two calculation approaches. The best option is Known Hydrostatics Mode. In this mode, the user enters KM or GM from reliable hydrostatic data. This is closer to how real vessel stability work is done, because KM and GM depend on the actual hull form and loading condition.
The second option is Approximate Rectangular / Wall-Sided Mode. This mode is mainly intended for classroom examples, simplified barges, quick concept checks, and learning exercises. It estimates BM using a rectangular vessel approximation and then calculates KM and GM from that estimate.
For a real ship, the known hydrostatics method should be preferred whenever valid data is available. Approximate mode is useful for understanding the relationship between beam, draft, KG and GM, but it is not a substitute for hydrostatic curves or approved stability information.
Small heel angles and large heel angles are not the same problem. Initial
metacentric stability is mainly concerned with small angles of heel. At small
angles, the approximation GZ ≈ GM × sin(θ) is commonly used for basic
stability calculations.
At larger heel angles, the movement of the centre of buoyancy becomes more complex. The shape of the immersed hull changes significantly, the deck edge may immerse, openings may approach the waterline, and downflooding may become a concern. Because of this, real large-angle stability must be checked with GZ curves, KN curves, cross curves of stability, loading condition data, and applicable stability criteria.
This calculator includes a heel angle input to help users understand how GZ changes with heel angle in a simplified initial stability model. If the selected heel angle is too large, the calculator warns that the simple GM-based approximation may no longer be reliable.
Deck-edge immersion is an important event in transverse stability. When the deck edge reaches the water, the vessel's stability behavior can change significantly. The simple relationship between GM and GZ becomes less reliable because the immersed hull geometry is no longer changing in the same simple way.
This calculator can estimate an approximate deck-edge immersion angle using beam and freeboard:
Deck-edge angle ≈ atan((2 × Freeboard) / Beam)
This is only a rough geometric warning and not a regulatory stability limit. Real deck-edge immersion depends on hull shape, sheer, camber, trim, loading condition, freeboard arrangement and openings. The warning is included to remind users that large heel angles require proper hydrostatic stability data.
This calculator can be useful in many learning and preliminary engineering situations. It is especially helpful when the user wants to connect stability formulas with calculated GM, corrected GM, GZ, righting moment, and warning output.
KG is one of the most important values in ship stability. A rise in KG means the centre of gravity moves upward. Since GM is calculated as KM minus KG, increasing KG reduces GM. This is why heavy weights placed high in the vessel can reduce stability.
Examples include deck cargo, containers stacked high, heavy lifts, added equipment, water accumulation on deck, passengers on upper decks, and modifications that add weight above the original design position. Even if the vessel's displacement does not change dramatically, the vertical position of weight can have a major effect on transverse stability.
In practical stability work, KG is calculated from the weight and vertical centre of gravity of each item onboard. The total KG of the vessel depends on the lightship weight, cargo, ballast, fuel, fresh water, stores and all other load components.
Beam and draft strongly influence the initial stability of a vessel. In simplified rectangular calculations, BM is proportional to beam squared and inversely proportional to draft. This means that a wider vessel generally has a larger transverse metacentric radius, while deeper draft can reduce BM in the simplified formula.
This is one reason why barges and wide vessels often have large initial stability. However, the complete stability behavior of a real vessel cannot be judged from beam alone. Hull form, displacement, freeboard, downflooding points, loading condition and range of stability are also important.
Initial stability describes the vessel's behavior at small angles of heel. It is closely related to GM. Overall stability, however, requires more information. A vessel may have positive initial GM but still fail stability requirements if the GZ curve, range of stability, downflooding angle, area under the curve, or maximum righting arm are not satisfactory.
This is why GM should not be treated as the only measure of safety. GM is important, but it is only one part of intact stability assessment. Real stability approval requires checking the vessel against the applicable rules, criteria and loading conditions.
This transverse stability calculator is intended for education, quick checks and simplified working examples. It is not a replacement for an approved stability booklet, approved loading computer, class-approved software, statutory intact stability assessment, damage stability assessment, inclining experiment report, or professional naval architecture review.
For real vessels, always use approved hydrostatic tables, KN curves, GZ curves, loading manuals, stability booklets, class society requirements, flag state requirements and onboard loading computer results. The output from this calculator should be treated as a simplified estimate only.